This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| 
                    the_neutrino_winds-group [2014/06/12 15:41] richers  | 
                
                    the_neutrino_winds-group [2014/06/12 18:46] (current) schutrumpg  | 
            ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| **Procedure** | **Procedure** | ||
| + | |||
| * Calculate reaction rates given electron neutrino energy & flux, and electron anti-neutrino energy and flux | * Calculate reaction rates given electron neutrino energy & flux, and electron anti-neutrino energy and flux | ||
| * modify XNet to include these reaction rates | * modify XNet to include these reaction rates | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
| * rpf1 is set to inverse partition-function stuff if inverse rate, 1 if forward rate (determined by whether a "v" is in the reaction rate database entry | * rpf1 is set to inverse partition-function stuff if inverse rate, 1 if forward rate (determined by whether a "v" is in the reaction rate database entry | ||
| * csect1 = reaction rate = (number flux)*(cross section) | * csect1 = reaction rate = (number flux)*(cross section) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Input Parameters** | ||
| + | |||
| + | Extracted input parameters from T. Fischer et al. using GSYS 2.4 (a program to extract data points from graphs) http://www.jcprg.org/gsys | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Simulations** | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ran simulations using xnet for different $Y_e$ values and different progenitor masses. We tried to see the effect of the presence of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos in the r-process abundance patern. | ||