This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
literature_links [2024/07/31 22:30] sunli |
literature_links [2024/07/31 22:31] (current) sunli |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | NS_Radlist: The new atomic radiation library for elements up to Z=100 and all atomic shells has been completed. The testing of the NS_Radlist is progressing well and will be released in early 2023. | + | https:// |
+ | NS_Radlist: The new atomic radiation library for elements up to Z=100 and all atomic shells has been completed. The testing of the NS_Radlist is progressing well and will be released in early 2023.\\ | ||
- | NS_RadList – calculations of atomic radiations from nuclear decay (T. Kibedi, B. Tee, B. Coombes /ANU) | + | NS_RadList – calculations of atomic radiations from nuclear decay (T. Kibedi, B. Tee, B. Coombes /ANU)\\ |
A new numerical database (BrIccEmis_DB), | A new numerical database (BrIccEmis_DB), | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
The output files include a detailed report of the calculations with the list of decay energies, intensities of EC, beta, gamma, CE, Auger electron and X-ray radiations, as well as a plot of the emitted atomic radiations. Uncertainties of the atomic radiations are calculated from the uncertainties in the EC and CE processes. Uncertainties in the atomic transition rates in EADL [6] are not very well defined and are excluded from the calculations. The propagation of uncertainties is carried out with UncTools [8] using a Monte Carlo technique. | The output files include a detailed report of the calculations with the list of decay energies, intensities of EC, beta, gamma, CE, Auger electron and X-ray radiations, as well as a plot of the emitted atomic radiations. Uncertainties of the atomic radiations are calculated from the uncertainties in the EC and CE processes. Uncertainties in the atomic transition rates in EADL [6] are not very well defined and are excluded from the calculations. The propagation of uncertainties is carried out with UncTools [8] using a Monte Carlo technique. | ||
- | References: | + | References:\\ |
- | [1] B.P.E. Tee., et al., EPJ Web of Conf. 232 (2020) 01006. | + | [1] B.P.E. Tee., et al., EPJ Web of Conf. 232 (2020) 01006.\\ |
- | [2] E. Schönfeld and H. Janssen, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A369 (1996) 527. | + | [2] E. Schönfeld and H. Janssen, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A369 (1996) 527.\\ |
- | [3] X. Mougeot, Appl. Rad. and Isot. 154 (2019) 108884. | + | [3] X. Mougeot, Appl. Rad. and Isot. 154 (2019) 108884.\\ |
- | [4] T. Kibédi, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A589 (2008) 202. | + | [4] T. Kibédi, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A589 (2008) 202.\\ |
- | [5] B.Q. Lee, et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 92 (2016) 641. | + | [5] B.Q. Lee, et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 92 (2016) 641.\\ |
- | [6] S.T. Perkins, et al., LLNL, UCRL-50400-V-30 1991. | + | [6] S.T. Perkins, et al., LLNL, UCRL-50400-V-30 1991.\\ |
- | [7] I.M. Band, et al, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 81 (2002) 1. | + | [7] I.M. Band, et al, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 81 (2002) 1.\\ |
- | [8] T. Kibédi, B. Coombes and A.E. Stuchbery (in preparation). | + | [8] T. Kibédi, B. Coombes and A.E. Stuchbery (in preparation).\\ |