task:k500_hebttuning
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| task:k500_hebttuning [2025/08/07 18:25] – lange | task:k500_hebttuning [2025/08/07 18:42] (current) – lange | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| * Scale the HEBT from a previous cocktail. | * Scale the HEBT from a previous cocktail. | ||
| * Sending beam to FC2192 and/or viewer at D2191 and tweak the HEBT dipoles to maximize the current/ | * Sending beam to FC2192 and/or viewer at D2191 and tweak the HEBT dipoles to maximize the current/ | ||
| - | * Use vertical correctors in the HEBT section before the dipoles to adjust the vertical position of the beam | + | * If possible, use vertical correctors in the HEBT section before the dipoles to adjust the vertical position of the beam |
| * It may be useful to quad center in the HEBT section before the dipole. The beam out of the cyclotron is not always at the same position or with the same angle. | * It may be useful to quad center in the HEBT section before the dipole. The beam out of the cyclotron is not always at the same position or with the same angle. | ||
| * One can use the D2002 and D2010 correctors to quad center while sending beam to viewer D2040. You can also send beam to the stub faraday cup D2065 and use the same correctors to maximize the current. This may help if the starting point is very far off. | * One can use the D2002 and D2010 correctors to quad center while sending beam to viewer D2040. You can also send beam to the stub faraday cup D2065 and use the same correctors to maximize the current. This may help if the starting point is very far off. | ||
| - | * After quad centering, send be to D2191 viewer and use the HEBT dipoles and vertical corrector D2038 to re-center | + | * After quad centering, send beam to D2191 viewer and use the HEBT dipoles and vertical corrector D2038 to re-center |
| * After centering is decent, evaluate whether focusing elements need to be adjusted. | * After centering is decent, evaluate whether focusing elements need to be adjusted. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * It may be necessary to readjust correctors/ | * It may be necessary to readjust correctors/ | ||
| - | === Initial | + | * Restore slit positions from a previous run. Measure the beam on FC2192 and calculate the flux. Adjust intensity as necessary to stay within safe flux levels through the window |
| + | * Send beam to external viewer D2197. Adjust the slit positions to produce the largest square possible without hitting the exit flange of the beamline. The flange is 50 mm diameter, so the square should be close to 35x35mm. | ||
| + | * Use Viola to measure the beam size and adjust slits accordingly. It can be useful to open the slits wide open to see the outer edge of the beamline, then insert slits one by one. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === HEBT Adjustment During Cocktail Beam change | ||
| + | |||
| + | When changing between beams within a cocktail, the HEBT should require less adjustment. So far we have observed that the beam size and uniformity remains quite similar by leaving the focusing elements and slits unchanged. It is necessary to adjust the HEBT dipoles to recenter the beam horizontally, | ||
task/k500_hebttuning.1754605550.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/08/07 18:25 by lange
